The irony is that construction desperately needs young, keen people like Shaied. Research in January by ConstructionSkills showed that the industry has to train 83,000 skilled workers a year to meet growth. And the consequences for business? Inevitably, a decline in productivity and an increase in costs. The National Employers Skills Survey showed that 40% of construction firms experienced increased costs because of a lack of skills.
Demand for construction has never been greater. Government 鈥� construction's biggest client 鈥� is calling on the industry to deliver ever more ambitious targets on schools, housing, hospitals and transport infrastructure. But there are fears that the labour shortages are a major constraint on the industry.
At the heart of these problems is a legacy of poor recruitment and training. Construction is known for being a fragmented industry, structured around subcontractors and a mobile workforce. That makes it flexible and able to respond to rises in demand. But when it comes to training, there is little incentive for firms to invest. This is partly why so many colleges fail to find work experience placements for their students, and why in a workforce of two million, more than one-quarter have no vocational qualifications.
ConstructionSkills' latest initiative seeks to address these problems by finding an industry-wide approach to training. One method of reaching the whole supply chain, according to Peter Lobban, chief executive of ConstructionSkills, would be to organise training around the construction project. "Seventy-five per cent of the industry is based on subcontracts where crafts people are not directly employed. We need a major shift towards project based training, where we can start training new groups of people." The idea is that the whole supply chain participates in training and all firms benefit from a properly qualified workforce.
On site training and assessment (OSAT) is seen as the key to achieving the industry's own target of an all-qualified workforce by 2010. The aim is for all existing workers to attain an NVQ level 2 and associated CSCS card. Already ConstructionSkills has had some success with a pilot scheme set up in association with the Learning Skills Council.
But ConstructionSkills is concerned that if more funding does not become available such schemes will never get off the ground. The levy is already stretched by current grant commitments. ConstructionSkills estimates that about 拢40m a year is needed for the OSAT program to become UK wide and 拢20m for large-scale apprentice recruitment and training. In particular it would like to see extra funding to compensate employers for the time lost when training an apprentice. The target of an end to the skills shortage and an all-qualified workforce is not unrealistic, but it does require the political will to make it happen.
As a Sector Skills Council since September 2003, ConstructionSkills should be in a strong lobbying position. Last year the government issued its skills white paper, which proposed collaboration in the form of sector skills agreements between employers, government and training providers (see page 54 for more details). These agreements could revolutionise the way training is conducted. In drawing up these agreements ConstructionSkills will be consulting employers. Now is the chance for employers to make their voice heard in the debate.
The consequences if ConstructionSkills fails to broker this new training deal could be devastating. Without adequate, well targeted funding the whole industry will suffer 鈥� it will affect not just productivity rates, health and safety standards or government targets, it will also continue to limit the potential of thousands of young people like Shaied. Much depends on how the industry reacts to this challenge and how much employers are committed to it. As Lobban puts it: "Is our industry up for this? And if so, how can it see it working?"
Your say: What are the skills priorities?
We need more skilled resources. Better trained, better qualified people. Every time the market expands we fall back on overseas labour. We need a stronger indigenous skills pool. That鈥檚 exactly what ConstructionSkills is trying to do. The other side of this is the industry has got to back ConstructionSkills, it can鈥檛 just devolve responsibility for training.Peter Rogers, chairman of the strategic forum and developer Stanhope
The most important issue is more funding from government and to get small to medium sized companies involved in training. Our training centres have waiting lists for apprentices. The problem is firms are frightened by the cost. They don鈥檛 realise what鈥檚 available in terms of CITB-ConstructionSkills and LSC grants.
Adrian Harrison, training manager, Henry Boot
At the moment colleges are not dynamic places, they are underfunded. But they have the potential to be centres of excellence. They could also do more to offer short courses for people who could do with brushing up on skills. The problem is government policy favours academic education, vocational training isn鈥檛 valued. We could learn a lot from other countries, like Australia where crafts have a higher status.
Tim Senn, managing director, Oakwoods Builders and Joinery Ltd, Oxfordshire, employs 33 people
I believe the sector skills status of ConstructionSkills will help to raise awareness of the skills shortage faced by the industry. But we need collaboration between ConstructionSkills, employers and the government to have a significant influence on the demand for skills. There鈥檚 been a lot of research on the projected skills shortages and we need to work together to address this problem
Martin Price, managing director, Carpentry Management Contracting Ltd, Bedfordshire, about 75 staff and subcontractors
The big question is how to encourage high quality candidates to join construction based training schemes as their first and not last choice. Employers do need to put together their own plans to recruit and retain staff, this may include student sponsorships; improved working conditions and facilities; access to high-end IT; ongoing and comprehensive training programmes; and development opportunities, including mentoring schemes.
Brian Baily, chairman and senior partner, Baily Garner LLP, Greenwich based multi-skilled practice, voted one of the Sunday Times best small companies to work for
Employer power: The great skills debate
- "The vision is that for the first time employers can be confident that training will meet job needs"
Sir Michael Latham, chairman of ConstructionSkills
The aim is to raise skills levels, reduce the skills shortage and increase productivity. ConstructionSkills is asking employers for their views on a range of topics, such as: how can apprenticeships work better? How can we qualify more workers? Do graduates meet the needs of the industry? How can we set up joint-contractor training? How much should employers contribute to the cost of training?
Peter Lobban believes these agreements are a unique opportunity for employers to have their say and to negotiate a new deal for training in construction. 鈥淭he cynics may say it will never work but what a fantastic opportunity to achieve a professional industry we can all be proud of.鈥�
星空传媒 readers can have their say on the future of training by l