All Comment articles 鈥� Page 661
-
CommentConsumer power
Adjudication gets a good press from the industry, so it comes as a surprise when a judge rules that it is unfair when used for disputes with consumers
-
Comment
CM is wounded, not dead
So construction management is found to be responsible for another major disaster to add to the severe criticism the procurement route received at Holyrood (11 March, pages 42-46). The Great Eastern Hotel case must be the final nail in the coffin?
-
Comment
The class struggle continues
Dominic Helps鈥� thoughtful article on the different rules for payment between builder and consultant designer stopped short of discussing why there should be differences for services whose intentions are broadly similar (鈥淧ay slip鈥�, 11 February, page 63).
-
CommentWonders & blunders
This week Alain de Botton contrasts a playful estate north of Amsterdam with new housing in this country
-
Comment
Find yourself a bench
How long do contractors really believe they can sustain a no benchmarking, no measurement approach? With the threat of PFI-related sector-specific benchmarking, growing international competition and increasingly educated clients, the clear message is measure up or lose out.
-
Comment
The best answer to Blyth
A new design-and-build agreement aims to simplify contractors鈥� rights of redress over design flaws that predate novation
-
Comment
Vote wisely
RICS members are being given the opportunity to vote for members of the governing council.
-
-
CommentThe Singapore grip
Singapore is about to bring in its own version of the Construction Act. It has much the same aims as the English law but has a better grasp of the issues
-
CommentFor your eyes only
It is commonly believed that documents marked 鈥榳ithout prejudice鈥� must not be read by a third party. In fact, it all depends on what they say
-
CommentA simple disaster
A cautionary tale about what happens if you assume that a dispute does not exist (and therefore you can bypass arbitration) and are, as it turns out, wrong
-
Comment
Defining undefined
I read Ann Minogue鈥檚 article regarding defined and undefined provisional sums with interest (3 December, page 49).
-
Comment
Safe crackers
In a follow-up to the safety summit, 星空传媒 invited a panel of safety experts to join an online debate about the issues it highlighted. This is what they had to say
-
Comment
Crystal clear
CIB and Birse entered into a contract on 8 August 2000 for the construction of a data centre in Molesworth Street, London E13. CIB terminated the contract on 21 December 2001. Birse brought claims based upon the final account, and the cost of completing the works on the basis ...
-
-
Comment
Yellow card
The article 鈥淏iting Back鈥� (25 February, page 52) referred to the chairman鈥檚 final report of the deliberations of the Payment Working Group for the review of Part 2 of the Construction Act.
-
Comment
A hard way to earn 拢2
If you have snagging claims against a contractor, can you sue them for the cost of rectifying the defects after a certain time? Indeed you can. But read this article first
-
Comment
No such stipulation
I am writing in response to your article on the Bath Spa, 鈥淢oney down the drain鈥� (11 February, page 26).
-
Comment
A victory of sorts
Insurance companies may have failed in an attempt to stop payouts to workers with a lung condition caused by asbestos, but they did manage to limit compensation