All Comment articles – Page 659

  • Comment

    An anglocentricismophobe writes

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    I recently took a little time out from tending my croft and drowning my sorrows after another Calcutta Cup defeat to read ǿմý.

  • Comment

    There, there

    2005-04-08T00:00:00Z

    The proposed European services directive has been dubbed Bolkestein’s Monster. But it’s not that terrifying, if you’ll all just calm down and read the small print

  • Comment

    Who’s suing whom

    2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

    A round-up of writs in the Technology and Construction Court

  • Comment

    Safety slip

    2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

    I’m sure mine is not the only email regarding the article about the Arnolfini Arts Centre in Bristol (11 March, page 50).

  • Comment

    Roger and the women

    2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

    With reference to Roger Knowles’ letter claiming that women choose not to work on site because of their nails (11 March, page 38): well, now we know what he really thinks about women in building.

  • Comment

    The road to victory

    2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

    “The best part of the industry is fabulous.”

  • Comment

    Hold your horses

    2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

    With reference to the article headlined “M&E trade bodies propose mandatory training levy”, (18 March, page 17), the first paragraph gives the impression that the trade associations within the building services engineering sector are proposing the introduction of a “compulsory training levy”.

  • Hansom
    Comment

    Hansom

    2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

    A QS enjoys the profit-boosting side effects of promotions, while April’s fools suffer at the hands of two Canadian artists and a blackberry

  • Comment

    Pay for what you get

    2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

    Good lawyers are said to be reassuringly expensive, so why don’t clients pay top dollar for quality work by M&E firms? Could it be the sector doesn’t value itself highly enough?

  • Morgana Butterworth
    Comment

    Going too far

    2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

    A case in the South-west may lend new popularity to a dispute resolution method that many thought had gone out of style

  • Comment

    Directions to Dartmoor

    2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

    Two solicitors have published a document listing 47 common practices in the industry, all of which are also criminal offences. It’s a real eye opener …

  • Comment

    Conflicts in the contract

    2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

    The claimant brought a claim for damages as widow and executrix of the estate of her husband who was fatally injured in an accident. She had sued Drake International Ltd (her husband’s employer’s) and Southampton Container Terminals (who conducted operations at the site that the fatality occurred).The trial judge found ...

  • Comment

    Free-range children

    2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

    Delighted to see that Kingsmead Primary School has 50% lower running costs than a typical school (18 March, page 16). Pity it looks as though it is a farm building for rearing chickens.David Bevan, director, Troika Contracting

  • Anthony Thornton
    Comment

    The case of Rich vs Poor

    2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

    It is often assumed that disputes are waged between the legal champions of well-heeled clients. But this is not so, as the McLibel case illustrates

  • Tim Willis
    Comment

    The arrangement

    2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

    The Appeal Court has ruled that lawyers and judges are safe from the Proceeds of Crime Act, but that is no help to adjudicators, arbitrators, valuers or clients

  • Comment

    Consultants: caution advised

    2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

    The purpose of the City of London Law Society novation agreement, according to Paul Cowan and Marc Hanson (18 March, page 54), is for the consultant to be regarded as always performing services for the benefit of the contractor.

  • Comment

    One adjudicator after another

    2005-04-01T00:00:00Z

    The claimant, EDS, was a principal subcontractor carrying out the design and installation of electrical services at the Great Western Royal Hotel, Paddington. Costain Skanska Joint Venture was the contractor. The contract was the DOM/2 1981 edition including some amendments. EDS sought to enforce the decision of an adjudicator ...

  • Comment

    Who’s suing whom

    2005-03-24T00:00:00Z

    A round-up of the writs in the Technology and Construction Court, including a punch-up over £45k-a-day delays, a row over the cost of flood damage, and a property deal that turned sour

  • Comment

    Legalaid

    2005-03-24T00:00:00Z

    This month our experts help a developer to tackle the complications that arise when the main contractor becomes insolvent halfway though a project

  • Comment

    There’s nothing wrong with JCT

    2005-03-24T00:00:00Z

    Gillian Birkby’s salutary tale (“A hard way to earn £2”, 11 March, pag1e 60) could be seen to blame JCT80 for the mess that arose from allowing a client to take over part of an uncompleted building. If so, she is wrong.