Homeless people will be offered a ticket out of town under proposals to reduce rough sleeping in Scarborough

Rough sleepers with no connection to the area would be offered travel vouchers to leave under the draft homelessness strategy presented to the Tory-led council鈥檚 housing and property overview and scrutiny committee on 29 March.

The report claims that Scarborough has been experiencing 鈥渞elatively high levels of inward migration of transient rough sleepers鈥 due to its seaside location 鈥 although the council鈥檚 first formal count of rough sleepers in October last year revealed just 12. The council wants to halve that number.

The scheme mirrors a pilot project in York last year.

But a regional housing advice service said the idea needed to be treated cautiously and must never be used as a first resort.

Denise Rooney, coordinator for the York and North Yorkshire Housing Advice Research Project, said: 鈥淚f people want to return to another area then we don鈥檛 have a problem with that.

鈥淚f this is offered as a first option without exploring what their housing issues or needs are, then we would be a little concerned that people won鈥檛 be allowed to progress a housing or homelessness application.

鈥淭he person would still have nowhere to live and might need more support.鈥

The draft report states that the action plan aims to use an 鈥渁ssertive and persistent鈥 approach to discourage rough sleeping. Other proposals include holding regular rough sleeping sweeps to identify homeless people and encourage them to seek help for their problems.

A spokeswoman for Scarborough council said: 鈥淭he vouchers are one idea that we are looking into. If people, for whatever reason, thought they would come to Scarborough and perhaps thought they would get a job and haven鈥檛 got the means to get back to friends and family, giving them a travel ticket or voucher might be one way of helping them get off the streets.鈥

Causes of homelessness in scarborough, 2004:

  • Parents no longer willing to accommodate: 68 cases

  • Loss of assured shorthold tenancy: 78 cases

  • Violent relationship: 55 cases

  • Friend/relations no longer able to accommodate: 28 cases