Opinion – Page 632

  • Comment

    Good practice vs Dracula

    2002-06-08T00:00:00Z

    The construction industry regards fitness for purpose with horror – but, as a recent Court of Appeal case demonstrates, there's really nothing to be afraid of

  • Comment

    Ours not to reason why

    2002-06-08T00:00:00Z

    If you're an 'expert determiner' and choose to go your own sweet way rather than obey instructions, then don't. Your decision is likely to be set aside

  • Comment

    Falconer-free planning

    2002-06-08T00:00:00Z

    Bye-bye Byers, and farewell Falconer, too – which is a splendid opportunity for people of goodwill to create a planning system that actually works. So, let's take it

  • Comment

    Hansom

    2002-06-08T00:00:00Z

    This week, our diarist is rushed to hospital suffering from football fever complicated by alcoholic poisoning – but still managed to file the following stories

  • Comment

    Another ruddy shake-up

    2002-06-08T00:00:00Z

    Tony Blair's unexpectedly sweeping reshuffle raises as many questions for construction as it answers (pages 22-23). Few will bemoan Stephen Byers' departure, and Alistair Darling has said that he's not going to "tear up" the 10-year transport plan. But then he was drawn into an ugly spat with Downing Street ...

  • Comment

    Let's get this straight

    2002-06-08T00:00:00Z

    The Court of Appeal decision in Parsons vs Purac does not offer the losing party to an adjudication a way out of paying – whatever it said in Ðǿմ«Ã½

  • Comment

    Legal letters

    2002-06-08T00:00:00Z

    Handle with careGillian Birkby ("The ASP with a sting in its tail", 10 May, pages 50-51) identified some areas in which those using application service providers (ASP) to operate their extranets have to be wary. I am concerned that the honeyed words of the marketers have temporarily blinded her to ...

  • Comment

    Who's suing whom

    2002-06-08T00:00:00Z

    Writs issued in the Technology and Construction Court

  • Comment

    You're on your own

    2002-05-31T00:00:00Z

    Two recent decisions in the House of Lords have made the scope for claiming contribution from other negligent parties much narrower than was thought

  • Comment

    See you, Jimmy

    2002-05-31T00:00:00Z

    Got a dispute with your builder? Then try to work it out without bothering the Court of Appeal – regardless of what you may have heard on Radio 2

  • Comment

    Anatomy of a fiasco

    2002-05-31T00:00:00Z

    As the World Cup kicks off in the beautiful (and completed) arenas of Japan and South Korea, our attention is again on England’s beautiful (but unstarted) stadium in Wembley. Three consultants’ reports presented to MPs last week cast new light on the cost of the troubled project and the controversial ...

  • Comment

    Hansom

    2002-05-31T00:00:00Z

    More skulduggery as our diarist uncovers dodgy dealings in the World Cup, impecunious lawyers and a questionable proposal from Cyril Sweett

  • Comment

    Hell on Earth

    2002-05-31T00:00:00Z

    Abandoned cars are one thing, but some cities are littered with abandoned homes. Can draft planning guidance bring hope to areas that have abandoned it?

  • Comment

    A journey without maps

    2002-05-31T00:00:00Z

    The success of a project is often down to the people working on it, but clarity as to who does what, as well as organisational structure, seem to be all-important

  • Comment

    The moral law

    2002-05-31T00:00:00Z

    A little-known fact is that architects have the same 'moral' rights over their buildings as writers have over their novels. But what does that mean for the practice?

  • Comment

    Getting all the credit

    2002-05-24T00:00:00Z

    You pay interest on the money you owe the bank, but the contractor that owes you cash doesn't. That's hardly fair, and the courts have belatedly noticed

  • Comment

    In the soup

    2002-05-24T00:00:00Z

    One week you're sharing friendly lunches, the next you're at each other's throats. It's what happens when your star QS leaves – and takes your clients with him

  • Comment

    Making sense of Potters Bar

    2002-05-24T00:00:00Z

    We know what caused the Potters Bar rail crash, but we still don't know who. Jarvis, which is responsible for the track, claims to have evidence that the faulty points were sabotaged – a possibility highlighted in Ðǿմ«Ã½ last week, despite being dismissed by rail experts. Investigators seem adamant that ...

  • Comment

    Hansom

    2002-05-24T00:00:00Z

    This week, our reliably pugnacious diarist aims a flurry of blows at Tesco, English Heritage, Sir Neil Cossons and Prince Charles' beloved Poundbury

  • Comment

    Skills scheming

    2002-05-24T00:00:00Z

    Registration of skilled workers could be a boost for the industry – if the information was not being used for less worthy purposes such as poaching