Opinion 鈥� Page 585
-
Comment
The case for Castleford
I read with interest your article about The Castleford Project. This is an innovative and bold project which will bring great benefits to the people of Castleford.
-
Comment
The Castleford trip
You described Castleford as "nondescript" in your profile of Sarah Wigglesworth. I think you should try a mind-expanding substance 鈥� which I've found Castleford to be, as someone involved in The Castleford Project.
-
CommentWonders & blunders
Adrian Tinniswood admires an example of Wren's post-Fire reconstruction but despairs at a more recent act of demolition
-
Comment
Held hostage
The appellant, Mowlem plc, had contracted with the respondent local authority, Bath & North East Somerset District Council, to carry out restoration works to the Heritage Spa 星空传媒s in Bath. A dispute arose over responsibility for problems in the paint coating that had been applied to four pools as part ...
-
Comment
Flight and fight
The new museum pavilion at RAF Hendon is home to some supreme examples of aeronautical engineering. To create a building fit for planes such as the Hawker Harrier and Sopwith Camel, architect Feilden Clegg Bradley came up with a roof made of materials associated with aviation 鈥� stainless steel and ...
-
Comment
Anyone fancy a fight?
The New Engineering Contract's non-confrontational aims are making it increasingly popular 鈥� but a dispute over whether it allows late claims would be handy
-
CommentBrief encounter: What did Wilcox mean?
Judge Wilcox's decision in London vs Waterman seemed to float the idea that adjudication should be restricted to simple cases. Is that really what he suggested?
-
Comment
Scary stuff
A little-known law about competitive advantage could mean that your well intentioned relationship-building lands you in a heap of trouble with the law
-
-
Comment
A salty tale
If two parties to a dispute give different accounts of what happened, courts look for something on paper. Trouble is, documents can be too persuasive
-
Comment
I'll take that bet
John Smith offers to bet me that Constructing Excellence can't improve the image of the construction industry in a quantifiable way in two years (6 February, page 33).
-
Comment
Just one tiny problem
I was intrigued to read (13 February, page 13) of the alleged theft of accident books, apparently to be sold on to personal injury lawyers.
-
Comment
Construction superstars?
It's high time construction pushed itself forward in the way other, more "sexy", industries do.
-
Comment
May we just say 鈥�
Some people are unlikely to have been impressed by Marc Hanson's article in your legal section, "Keep taking the supplements" (30 January 2004, page 48).
-
Comment
RICS' student lethargy
Once more 星空传媒 has hit a topical nail on the head ("You'll pay for this", 23 January, page 3)
-
CommentDon't do down planners
Your cover story "Planning - a world where nothing works" (20 February) misses the point on how and why we need to reform the system.
-
CommentWhat are we here for?
A reader writes聽As QSs already have at least four professional bodies they can be members of, why do they need another? We explain what the QSi has to offer
-
