Human resources managers often bemoan the lack of talented people applying for jobs in the sector – only to reject highly-qualified candidates from other sectors. So why do they put up barriers that only hurt the housing world in the end?
“I was very lucky to get my first job in housing,” says Sarah-Daisy Bernard. “If you have no experience, people are reluctant to take you on and train you up. Fortunately, the recruitment consultant knew me and convinced my employer to interview me. If it had hinged on my CV alone, I don’t think I’d have got anywhere.”
Bernard is now a support worker in a sheltered housing scheme in Cambridge, but it took her three months to get a foothold on the housing career ladder coming in from the private sector, despite her clear enthusiasm and her willingness to take a pay cut.
Surprisingly for a sector that’s supposed to be suffering from a chronic skills shortage, Bernard’s story is not uncommon. Social landlords may say they understand the need to attract people with transferable skills from outside a dwindling pool of housing specialists, but recruitment consultants paint a very different picture. They speak of managers constrained by a lack of resources or regulatory pressures, who are unwilling or unable to take a chance on workers from outside the sector, however eager the applicants are to begin a career in housing.
“We hear of organisations claiming they can’t attract private sector people, but that’s not a problem as far as we’re concerned,” says Helen Stokes, director of Morgan Hunt, which fills between 300 and 400 vacancies a week. “We get people who are very intelligent, who’ve worked for many years in management or IT earning £30,000 to £40,000, and who want to start as a housing officer on £9 an hour – but often our clients won’t interview people unless they’ve done the same job before. It’s an ongoing issue.”
A regional manager – who declined to be named – of another consultancy that supplies staff to social landlords, says associations often request that they trawl through a range of applicants, only to reject those who don’t have specific housing experience. And not only for specialist housing management roles – a candidate who had previously worked as a receptionist in an optician’s was turned down for a similar role in a housing association; and a land buyer for a private housebuilding firm was deemed inappropriate for a development officer role. “He had very relevant experience, but they said: ‘No, we want someone who’s been a development officer in another housing association,’” says the manager.
Even those who have worked in the public sector before in similar roles can have difficulty. Liz Golding, proprietor of Brookside Housing Personnel, says she’s found it hard to place candidates with relevant public sector skills – from within the immigration advisory service, for example.
“I meet a brick wall. They say: ‘They’d be ideal if we could train them, but we can’t.’ They’d love to do it but they’ve not got the resources,” she says. “When you’ve got the Audit Commission, the Housing Corporation and numerous performance indicators to think about, this isn’t considered core business.”
Dawn Decoteau, managing director of another recruitment consultant EMA Solutions Plus, echoes this: “The housing sector is very performance driven and indicator based – you’re under pressure. If I were a manager, I’d want someone who could just come in and do the job.” Decoteau adds that even graduates of housing studies courses often don’t have enough practical experience to please employers.
It isn’t impossible for those outside the sector to break in. For finance and customer service roles, private sector experience is often seen as a boon, but for housing management roles above the most junior level, teaching new staff the basics of policy and legislation can be viewed as too steep a mountain to climb. “Entering housing from outside as a housing manager is impossible. It’s not necessarily the complexity, but there’s a lot to take in,” says Shau Match, director of market consultant Trinity Public Sector.
We get managers, intelligent people on £40,000 a year, who want to start as a housing officer on £9 an hour. But they don’t even get an interview
Helen Stokes, Morgan Hunt
Apart from entering the profession at a much lower grade, doing voluntary work is another way to gain the required experience – though even a willingness to work for nothing isn’t a guarantee. “It’s not always good experience, you have to look closely at the work they were given to do,” cautions Match. Decoteau of EMA Solutions Plus agrees: “Voluntary work may not be good enough. It depends on how much the organisation really allowed them to develop their skills.”
Such routes in also discriminate against those who are unable to put their financial commitments on hold to change careers.
“I certainly had to do some quite poorly paid jobs in housing before I could get a job with a salary I could live on,” confirms Sarah-Daisy Bernard. She was 23 and had amassed considerable office experience but had always been drawn to a career working in the care sector or with the homeless.
Her big break, she says, was a six-month stint at the YWCA in Islington, north London. “I was lucky because I’d done some admin work in a healthcare setting, which gave me experience of vulnerable people, but getting your first position is difficult. In the specialist care side of housing, there is so little funding, they haven’t got time to take someone off another job to train you up. I was very keen, and that helped, if you don’t know what you want to do, it would definitely put you off.”
This means that those who do make it are more committed, says Katy Crothall, manager of the housing team at Badenoch & Clark. “People who don’t give up, who will go and get voluntary experience or training, will succeed.
“If they can’t be bothered, you could question whether they should be working in the sector.”
But Golding believes it’s exactly this kind of attitude that’s stemming the supply of new blood to the sector, and that housing isn’t necessarily any more complex than other fields. “People can still be a bit precious about housing; they think ‘it’s our world’. This is an old-fashioned, misconceived attitude,” she says. “In every other sector, that’s not the approach. It’s who’s out there, who’s sparky and ready to learn, who’s going to be an asset to the organisation?”
And that’s perhaps the crux of the matter. Attracting much needed new talent to the sector means competing with a very wide variety of employers. Resources may be scarce and regulators fierce, but housing providers have no choice but to find ways of training new staff – because if they don’t, other organisations will.
Source
Housing Today
No comments yet