The month鈥檚 news round-up
鈥 The Scottish entrepreneur Sir Tom Hunter has emerged as a serious player in the British housebuilding industry with bids for both Wilson Bowden and Crest Nicholson due to be decided in the coming month. Hunter 鈥 who is backed by HBOS in his vehicle Castle Bidco 鈥 has steadily begun building a stake in the sector since last summer when he joined with property investors the Reuben Brothers to pay 拢1.1bn for the retirement home builder McCarthy & Stone. Castle Bidco is expected to finalise its 拢713m bid for Crest Nicholson at the end of February. Meanwhile, City analysts have said that the final shortlist of three bidders for Wilson Bowden will be announced before the end of January. Besides Hunter it will include rival housebuilders Barratt and George Wimpey. Speculation is rife that if Hunter succeeds in both bids he will merge the two businesses, creating the country鈥檚 fifth-biggest housebuilder.
鈥 Planners have come in for yet more criticism this month with the publication of two reports, one of which accuses them of damaging Britons鈥 quality of life and another which says they are too unpredictable. The former message is from think tank the Policy Exchange which calls for the abolition of the green belt because, it claims, it has strangled the UK鈥檚 urban areas. Oliver Hartwich, co-author of The Best Laid Plans 鈥 how planning prevents economic growth, published this week, said: 鈥淲e want to get rid of the national green belt policy. An extra 10% for urban areas would only be an extra 1% of land鈥 If you let cities grow naturally, you will see larger and more comfortable houses and lower house prices.鈥 He added that the 鈥済reying of our cities鈥 鈥 or disappearance of playing fields and other green spaces for development 鈥 has meant 鈥渨e are sacrificing the quality of life in the cities in order to protect the countryside鈥.
The report also calls for the planning gain supplement to be 拢0.5m per hectare and for the proceeds to be paid directly to local authorities.
The second report was compiled for the government by consultancy Arup and investigated 鈥渃ouncillor involvement in planning decisions鈥. It found that, contrary to expectation, many councillors are 鈥渞eluctant to get involved in [early] discussions鈥 due to good practice documents urging them to be cautious. As a result of this and other factors, it is 鈥渄ifficult鈥 to predict the outcome of many planning applications.
鈥 Housebuilders have told the Treasury that it is missing out on up to 拢150m in tax revenues each year due to increasingly protracted negotiations over the provision of affordable housing. At a meeting with Treasury officials last year it is understood that housebuilders claimed that affordable housing depresses land and scheme values and so hits their profits and the amount they then pay in taxes. The government is now expected to take steps to define in legislation precisely what councils can ask for in affordable housing negotiations. In a document for the House Builders Association, which analysed three consultation papers on the planning gain supplement that were published by the government in December, strategic policy adviser Roger Humber said one change would be to 鈥渋ntroduce a common starting point for the value of developer contributions to affordable housing鈥.
Three facts about... development in London
- Housebuilders had failed to start work on 127,800 homes at the end of 2006 on which they had secured planning permission
- This is enough land to cover the capital鈥檚 development needs for the next five years
- Housing starts rose 17% to 25,700 last year and could rise by a further 20% 鈥渙r more鈥 in 2007
Source: The Blue Book 2007 by London Development Research
Source
RegenerateLive
No comments yet